.

{2} GoogleTranslate (H)

English French German Spanish Italian Dutch Russian Portuguese Japanese Korean Arabic Chinese Simplified

Our New Stuff

{3} up AdBrite + eToro

Your Ad Here

Thursday, September 15, 2011

The Big Picture

The Big Picture


Attention Americans: You Won’t All Be Rich Tomorrow

Posted: 14 Sep 2011 04:30 PM PDT

(Source: Census.gov)>

If we were all to become suddenly rich tomorrow, the government’s revenue problems are solved at the current tax rates, so no worries in that case. But I place long odds on that, so let’s move on to what’s actually happening.

It’s as if the entire country has turned into Lake Wobegon, as if we’ve been overcome by an epidemic of illusory superiority.  As I’ve watched the Republican debates, I’ve listened closely for the applause lines, paid close attention to the questions and answers. I also keenly read a variety of papers and  occasionally watched Fox News.

My conclusion?

I am convinced that when President Obama mentions raising taxes on “the wealthiest Americans,” everyone thinks he is talking about them. I’m sure of it. I suppose I should be surprised, but when citizens admonish politicians to “Keep the government out of [their] Medicare,” I guess anything’s possible (like, say, an audience applauding the mere mention that Rick Perry has presided over more state-run executions than any governor in modern times).

Perhaps folks are thinking, “Well, my taxes might not go up now, since I’m making the median income, but my wages are going to quintuple any day now, I just know it.  And when they do, I’ll be damned if I’m going to pay one more plug nickel in taxes.  I also need to protect the loopholes for corporate jet owners, as I’ll surely soon be one.”  Folks, can we have a reality check here?  Pull out your most recent IRS Form 1040 and see exactly where you stand and whether or not you’re among the “wealthiest Americans” to which Obama has been referring.  There is no doubt that some of you are, but I am equally sure that the vast majority of you are not, even if TBP may draw a somewhat higher income cohort.  (As I read the comments to my recent post on the Census release (having already almost completed this post), I guess what I’m trying to say is summed up by Dogfish, who paraphrases Taibbi’s Griftopia:  “”…tea party types like Joe the Plumber identify with the rich because they think "they are one clogged toilet away from being millionaires.”"  News flash: they’re not.)

To quickly demonstrate the faulty thinking that must be at play here, let’s have a look at some economic statistics from the area in which Monday night’s debate took place.  Specifically the zip code in which the Florida State Fairgrounds resides — 33610.  Seems fair, since the audience was certainly enthusiastic enough about the slate of debaters and most definitely jazzed not to have their taxes raised.  (With all credit to The Reformed Broker for his astute observation, it did seem as though most of the audience arrived at the Fairgrounds in their Medicare-funded Rascal Scooters.)

Unfortunately, the American Community Survey (ACS) covering the 2010 Census won’t be released until Sept. 22, so we’ll have no choice but to use data from the 2000 Census (I’ll make a note to revisit this data in a couple of weeks).  So what do we learn about all those folks in 33610 (click through for Census fact sheet) who seem deathly afraid of having their taxes raised?

Give or take, it would seem there are probably just over 100 or so households (out of 12,000) that might see their taxes rise if some of what Obama proposes gets passes.  All the others, not so much.  We’ll have an updated number within the next two weeks, when the ACS is updated.  So let’s get a collective grip here, splash some cold water on our faces, and have an understanding about what is being proposed and whom it’s going to impact.

Having gotten that off my chest, below is another of the more distressing charts that appeared in the deck that accompanied the recent Census conference call on the Income/Poverty/Health Insurance release.  Neither chart (at the top or immediately below) really needs much by way of explanation.  It would be an understatement to call the trends disturbing.

~~~

~~~

Lastly, might as well get it out there that I’m making an effort to have a presence on Twitter.  I’m @TBPInvictus if you’re interested; it’s almost exclusively economy and markets related.  You’ll be wealthier for the follow.

10 Wednesday PM Reads

Posted: 14 Sep 2011 01:30 PM PDT

Here are the latest additions to my Instapaper for the ride home:

• Tim Geithner, Who Has Never Been Wrong About Anything, Rallies Markets (WSJ)
• Tax receipts & the Economy (Dr. Ed’s Blog)
• Nasar: How to Prevent Economic Crises (Bloomberg)
• Warning on Firms’ Pressure Warning on Firms’ (WSJ)
• That IPO Pop? Majority of 2011 U.S. Listings Are Underwater (WSJ)
• The Perils of Chasing Buffett (Deal Book)
• Meet Bank of America Merrill's New US Stock Strategist, Savita Subramanian (WSJ)
• Can you believe Wall Street? (Market Watch)
• 8 Star Trek Gadgets That Are No Longer Fiction (Mashable)
• U.S. Probe Lays Gulf Spill Blame on BP, Contractors (Scientific American)

What are you reading?

>

US Sentiment Market Review

Posted: 14 Sep 2011 12:30 PM PDT


Source: Kevin Lane, (FusionIQ) IQ Outlook , September 14, 2011

Kevin Lane:

We sit in the camp that requires more definitive proof from price action before we stick out nose out of the foxhole. In our view it is better to be a bit late, once the move has been clearly established, than to jump into the fray with both feet without limited evidence and then hope for the best.

Most charts are still in wide trading ranges and until they are resolved (up or down) it's best to let everyone else churn themselves around in the volatility. We would continue to focus not on the bad news, but rather how the market reacts to it because it's not the news but the reaction that counts . . .

Fisker Surf Plug-In Hybrid

Posted: 14 Sep 2011 12:00 PM PDT

Visualizing US/China Trade

Posted: 14 Sep 2011 11:45 AM PDT

click for ginormous chart

The Making of an Infographic: Visualizing US/China Trade

Source: Visual News

Fantasyland yesterday, delusion today

Posted: 14 Sep 2011 11:38 AM PDT

A Greece spokesperson is saying the following after the call with Merkel and Sarkozy, *GREEK BUDGET DECISIONS WILL SHIELD ECONOMY, STATEMENT SAYS, *GREEK BUDGET DECISIONS IN RECENT DAYS WILL HELP MEET TARGETS, *GREECE DETERMINED TO CARRY OUT ALL ACTS TO MEET BUDGET PLANS. GREECE TO MEET 2012 FISCAL TARGETS, PRIMARY SURPLUS WITH NEW MEASURES. Bottom line, Greece is likely going to get its next 8b euro tranche in 2 weeks but apparently Merkel, Sarkozy and Papandreou still don’t like paying attention to the bond market where the 1 yr yield in Greece is yielding 141.8%, the 2 yr is yielding 74.5% and the 10 yr is yielding 25.7%. This says of course that the only lifeline the Greek government has is thru the generosity of its neighbors as they have almost zero chance of paying back in full all that is owed. I mentioned Merkel being in fantasyland yesterday and delusion is the word today that comes to mind after seeing these Greek headlines. One would think at this point that Greece would want a more pronounced debt restructuring in order to slash their debt instead of playing this game of pretend because they’re afraid to hurt the feelings of bondholders.

BofA/Merrill Lynch Merger: How Did a Private Deal Turn Into a Federal Bailout

Posted: 14 Sep 2011 10:00 AM PDT

via Scribd:

BofA Merrill Lynch How Did a Private Deal Turn Into a Federal Bailout

Bring on the Drachma TARP

Posted: 14 Sep 2011 09:30 AM PDT

EU versus US: Equity Market Caps vs. Bank Assets

>

Hat tip Zero Hedge

>

Here is what Jefferies chief market strategist David Zervos had to say:

The bottom line is that it looks like a Lehman like event is about to be unleashed on Europe WITHOUT an effective TARP like structure fully in place. Now maybe, just maybe, they can do what the US did and build one on the fly – wiping out a few institutions and then using an expanded EFSF/Eurobond structure to prevent systemic collapse. But politically that is increasingly feeling like a long shot. Rather it looks like we will get 17 TARPs – one for each country. That is going to require a US style socialization of each banking system – with many WAMUs, Wachovias, AIGs and IndyMacs along the way. The road map for Europe is still 2008 in the US, with the end game a country by country socialization of their commercial banks. The fact is that the Germans are NOT going to pay for pan European structure to recap French and Italian banks - even though it is probably a more cost effective solution for both the German banks and taxpayers.

Where the losses WILL occur is at the ECB, where the Germans are on the hook for the largest percentage of the damage. And these will not just be SMP losses and portfolio losses. It will also be repo losses associated with failed NON-GERMAN banks. Of course in the PIG nations, the ability to create a TARP is a non-starter – they cannot raise any euro funding. The most likely scenario for these countries is full bank nationalization followed by exit and currency reintroduction.

Great stuff . . .

James Bianco: More Than 50% Chance of U.S. Recession

Posted: 14 Sep 2011 09:00 AM PDT

Email of the Day: Thoughtful vs Dogmatic

Posted: 14 Sep 2011 08:59 AM PDT

From an anoymous reader:

“Have you ever considered switching from thoughtful to dogmatic?  It’s a lot easier and you make more friends.  Plus, sometimes they send you free bumper stickers in the mail.”

I found that to be hilarious . . .

.

0 comments:

Post a Comment

previous home Next

{8} chatroll


{9} AdBrite FOOTER

{8} Nice Blogs (Adgetize)