The Big Picture |
- Wednesday AM Reading List
- New, Inexpensive Blood Test Tells You “How Long You Will Live” … But You Can Cheat and Live Longer
- Open Thread: Market Comeback?
- Votes on Measures to Adjust the StatutoryDebt Limit, 1978 to Present
- Tuesday Afternoon Reads
- Japan shows up in April IP
- Guide To the Greek Crisis
- Long Island Index
- In an Undercollateralized World
- The Long Island Index: The Clock is Ticking
Posted: 18 May 2011 01:30 AM PDT Here are the latest adds to my Instpaper:
What are you reading? |
New, Inexpensive Blood Test Tells You “How Long You Will Live” … But You Can Cheat and Live Longer Posted: 17 May 2011 11:30 PM PDT Washington's Blog strives to provide real-time, well-researched and actionable information. George – the head writer at Washington's Blog – is a busy professional and a former adjunct professor. ~~~ Scientists have developed a simple blood test to determine how long you will live. How? By measuring the length of your “telomeres”, the ends of chromosome. Basically, telomeres allow our cells to divide. When we’re young, our telomeres are long, and we can produce new cells with ease. As we age, our telomeres shorten, and it is harder to produce new cells. With fewer new cells to replace the older ones, we age. As the New York Times’ Gretchen Reynolds explained last year:
The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Department of Cell Biology and Neurosciences proved in 1996 the basic hypothesis using cell cultures:
Ethics Mark my words, a tidal wave of ethical issues has been released by the new, inexpensive (around $700 U.S. dollars) blood test for telomere length. Initially, every life insurer in the world will demand that all applicants get the test, for obvious reasons. If you’re telomeres are really short, you won’t live as long … which radically shifts the actuarial data. Indeed, as shown below, short telomeres might even outweigh risk factors such as smoking. While life insurance will be the area most directly impacted by the new blood test, many other areas of life could be affected as well. For example, health insurers may want their insureds to get tests as well, on the theory that people with shorter telomeres will need more medical care … and should thus pay higher premiums. As the Independent notes:
Employers may want their candidates to take the blood test. After all, why spend years training someone who might soon kick the bucket? Even lovers might insist their would-be spouses get a test before saying I do. It’s no fun to have kids with someone who won’t be there to raise them. How to cheat Exercise lengthens telomeres. As the Post-Gazette writes:
And the New York Times’ reported last year:
An extract of the Chinese herb astragalus has been engineered by a large California biotech company to produce a supplement which helps protect telomeres. But many otherwise healthy and reasonably-priced foods and supplements can also protect your telomeres as well. As Dr. Andrew Weil notes:
In the same article, Weil notes that vitamins C and E also lengthen telomeres:
Here’s Weil on Omega 3s:
And see this. Vitamin D helps to protect telomeres. Vitamin B6, B9 (called “folate”) and B12 help protect telomeres by reducing the amount of homocysteine in the body. As the Harvard School of Public Health notes:
Why is this important? Because high levels of homocysteine can greatly increase the rate at which your telomeres are shortened (trimethylglycine also significantly lowers homocysteine levels). Indeed, antioxidants in general helped protect telomeres. As the journal Circulation Research noted in 2004 (please excuse the hyper-technical language):
For plain English information on antioxidant protection, see this, this, this, this and this. And yes, foodies are in luck: resveratrol from red wine also helps protect telomeres and dark chocolate helps to protect DNA from oxidative damage. Finally, a positive mindset and relaxation protect telomeres. As Bill Andrews – Ph.D. in Molecular and Population Genetics, former Director of Molecular Biology at biotech giant Geron from 1992 to 1997, one of the principal discoverers of the components of human telomerase, an enzyme that makes telomeres grow, inventor on 35 U.S. issued patents related to telomerase, awarded 2nd place as “National Inventor of the Year” – says:
For more on the benefits of mediation on health and brain functions, see this, this and this. |
Posted: 17 May 2011 04:00 PM PDT It looked pretty ugly today, but the markets made up much of their losses — the Nasdaq flipped into the green, and the SPX and Dow made up more than half their losses. So what was this today? Beginning of a turn? Dead cat bounce? What say ye? |
Votes on Measures to Adjust the StatutoryDebt Limit, 1978 to Present Posted: 17 May 2011 03:00 PM PDT CRS Report for Congress Votes on Measures to Adjust the StatutoryDebt Limit, 1978 to Present Justin Murray Votes on Measures to Adjust the Statutory Debt Limit, 1978 to Present |
Posted: 17 May 2011 01:30 PM PDT The latest adds to my Instapaper:
What are you reading ? |
Posted: 17 May 2011 12:45 PM PDT In what seems to be a key look at the impact of the Japanese disaster on US Industrial Production, the Fed said motor vehicle/parts production fell a sharp 8.9% in April m/o/m as the delivery of key parts from captive suppliers in Japan were halted. Capacity Utilization in the auto sector fell sharply to 61.9% from 68% and it also helped to drag down overall Utilization to 76.9% from 77.6%. Taking out the influence of auto’s, IP rose .2% led by electric utility output, computer/electronics production, machinery and mining. ~~~ April Housing Starts totaled 523k annualized, 46k below expectations but March was revised up by 36k to 585k so taken together its about a wash relative to forecasts. Both single and multi family starts were down. Permits were well below forecasts at 551k vs the consensus of 590k and March was revised lower by 20k, also in both single and multi family categories. I’ve been making the argument for a while now but I repeat that lower starts are needed with a market that still has way too many homes relative to the demand for them and therefore lower permits and starts are good for the long term at the expense of the short term growth impact. The obvious impact of punk starts is the hit to the GDP component of residential construction but we still need the short term pain in order to further cleanse this economy of its previous excess. |
Posted: 17 May 2011 12:08 PM PDT Ralp Preusser and Sphia Salim at Bank of America Merrill Lynch look at various options in the Greek Tragedy > Hat tip FT Alphaville |
Posted: 17 May 2011 11:00 AM PDT |
In an Undercollateralized World Posted: 17 May 2011 10:30 AM PDT
His new book, Panderer for Power: The True Story of How Alan Greenspan Enriched Wall Street and Left a Legacy of Recession, was published by McGraw-Hill in November 2009. He was Director of Asset Allocation Services at John Hancock Financial Services in Boston. In this capacity, he set investment policy and asset allocation for institutional pension plans. ~~~ The world is undercollateralized. This is the single most important feature of the 2011 economy. Sixty years ago, if assets were worth less than loans, it was possible to work our way into the black. In 1950, 59% of U.S. corporate profits were from manufacturing; 9% were from finance. The roles of manufacturing and finance have reversed. Thus, we witness the desperate attempts to forestall what cannot be prevented. Yet, the world must deleverage. Banks must write off loans. Loans to bankrupt developers and companies must be called. Living standards must fall. The authorities are doing all they can to prevent the necessary deleveraging. That is the context in which Michael A.J. Farrell, CEO of Annaly Capital Management (NLY- NYSE), spoke to investors during his company’s first quarter 2011 conference call: “[T]he change that is happening in the financial markets is a chaotic mess. I believe the simultaneous execution of radical monetary policy, fiscal policy, and financial regulatory reform is introducing rather than reducing systemic risk in the global financial system by ignoring the simplest lesson of the scientific method. Rather than change one variable in a complex system and test the outcome, regulators and policymakers are changing virtually all of them at the same time: QRM [quantitative risk management], risk retention, the Volcker Rule, Basel III capital rules, derivatives clearing and related margin requirements. GSE reform. FAS 166 and 167. Zero-bound fed funds policy and QE2. Deficit financing, structural budgetary imbalances, and debt limit debate.” Where will this end? Michael Lewitt, proprietor of Harch Capital Management in Boca Raton, Florida, discussed the consequences of our leaders’ catastrophic policies in the May issue of his monthly letter, The Credit Strategist: “Rather than confronting sources of volatility, policymakers have sought to smooth out volatility at all costs. Unfortunately, these costs are proving to be very high and will ultimately prove prohibitive. Pressures build inside complex systems until they can no longer be suppressed. When these pressures can no longer be contained, they tend to erupt with far greater violence than had they been allowed to adjust earlier. Lewitt continued. Federal Reserve Chairman Greenspan and Bernanke “convinced investors the Fed would bail them out if the economy or markets got into serious trouble. As a result, investors engaged in increasingly reckless behavior…” The result: “Rather than saving the markets, Mr. Greenspan’s philosophy and approach guaranteed their failure.” One of the consequences is “the build-up of unsustainable debt levels.” We are overleveraged, undercollateralized, and accentuating these unsustainable imbalances. Lewitt notes, “the Federal Reserve has accounted for 101 percent of the net Treasury bond issuance during the first four months of 2011.” He goes on: “The U.S. government has been the largest purchaser of Treasuries, promulgating a Ponzi scheme of unprecedented scale.” The U.S. Treasury issues debt and QE2 buys it. Lewitt notes that 10-year Treasury yields have fallen from 3.59% on April, 11 2011, to 3.15% on May 6, 2011. Since the Fed is the sole net buyer, the 10-year-yield is not a real interest rate. (It has not been a true market for years, but never more so than now.) This is also true of the zero-percent short-term yield, one of the trial balloons listed by Michael Farrell. Interest rates are integral to the pricing of assets. A country without an interest rate has a stock market with a price, but not a value. The future-focused investor should estimate the value of stocks, commodities, and bonds as if interest rates were 5% higher. That day will come to pass: when assets seek the price of their true collateral. This is not widely appreciated. For instance, the recent dive in silver prices has been acclaimed as a bubble that popped. That might be true, if paper contracts were worth the value they purport to represent. There is not enough silver in the world to meet derivative claims – of ETFs, forward contracts, and so on. When this misrepresentation is widely recognized, physical silver will attract panic buying. Silver is a fairly small market, so this may go unnoticed. That will be a shame for the majority since everyone holds a paper claim that is not worth the money it is written on. Dollar bills, still flowing forth from the Federal Reserve (more exactly: from the U.S. Treasury’s Bureau of Printing and Engraving), are losing value every minute. Treasury securities are undercollateralized: the Treasury spends $3 for every $2 it receives in tax payments. What to do? One idea comes by way of footnote #8 in this month’s The Credit Strategist: “Readers interested in owning the Chinese currency can walk into the Bank of China in New York or Los Angeles and open a remnimbi-denominated account. While these accounts originally had limits on size, The Credit Strategist understands that these limits have now been lifted and meaningful amounts of money can be invested. These accounts are insured up to $250,000 by the FDIC (there must be some irony in that.)” |
The Long Island Index: The Clock is Ticking Posted: 17 May 2011 09:28 AM PDT The Long Island Index is a project that gathers and publishes data on the Long Island region. The Index does not advocate specific policies. Instead, our goal is to be a catalyst for action, by engaging the community in thinking about our region and its future. Specifically, the Index seeks to:
> The Clock is Still Ticking
The Clock is Still Ticking from Long Island Index on Vimeo. Video created for the Long Island Index 2011 report showing the key problems facing the region. The Rauch Foundation funded the Long Island Index to gather data on the Long Island region. Hat tip Simple Complexity |
You are subscribed to email updates from The Big Picture To stop receiving these emails, you may unsubscribe now. | Email delivery powered by Google |
Google Inc., 20 West Kinzie, Chicago IL USA 60610 |
0 comments:
Post a Comment