.

{2} GoogleTranslate (H)

English French German Spanish Italian Dutch Russian Portuguese Japanese Korean Arabic Chinese Simplified

Our New Stuff

{3} up AdBrite + eToro

Your Ad Here

Monday, September 29, 2014

The Big Picture

The Big Picture


Schizophrenic Financial Markets & Policy

Posted: 29 Sep 2014 02:00 AM PDT

Schizophrenic Financial Markets & Policy
David R. Kotok
Cumberland Advisors, September 27, 2014

 
We will start this weekend missive with three serious quotes and references.  They are from thoughtful work by professional and personal friends.  And they offer diverse views.

QUOTE # 1.

"We offer new analyses in this working paper of the impact of changes in the US labor force participation rate (LFPR). Right now, many observers of the US economy are attributing much of the historically huge decline in LFPR to demographic factors – despite the fact that the drop in participation is unprecedentedly rapid and coincident with the severe 2008-10 recession. If this attribution were correct, there would be little labor market slack left in the US economy, and the standard unemployment rate (minus the best-guess nonaccelerating inflation rate of unemployment [NAIRU]) would be a nearly sufficient target for that slack. The stakes are high for this assessment, not only because it will be a primary determinant of the timing of Federal Reserve policy tightening; the more one believes that current high long-term unemployment is cyclically (demand) driven rather than structurally (mismatch and demographic) driven, the more one believes workers can be brought back into employment through monetary (or other) stimulus."
– David Blanchflower and Adam Posen, "Wages and Labor Market Slack: Making the Dual Mandate Operational." Working Paper Series. Washington, DC. September 2014: WP 14-6. Peterson Institute for International Economics.

 

QUOTE # 2

"The unexpectedly swift decline in the unemployment rate in recent years has in large part been attributed to a drop in the labor force participation rate. The labor force participation rate has fallen due to cyclical factors such as workers temporarily dropping out of the workforce because of discouragement over job prospects, but also due to structural forces such as the Baby Boomers reaching retirement age and younger workers staying in school longer. But with the labor market finally gaining some traction this year, is the unemployment rate now falling as more unemployed workers are finding jobs?"
– John Silvia and Sarah Watt House, Labor Force Flows: Movement Behind the Headlines (2014) Wells Fargo Securities.

 

QUOTE # 3

"The income divide in the United States is not a new phenomenon; it has been increasing for several decades. The Gini coefficient is a common statistic used to measure the degree of income inequality within a population…. Viewed in a different light, the top 5% of US households represented 20% of aggregate income in 1960, but by the mid 2000s the proportion rose to around 35%…. Moreover, the US far outstrips the global average for inequality. In 2011, the average income of the world's richest 10% was nine times that of the poorest 10%. In the US, the ratio was much higher, at 14-to-1."
– Ellen Zentner and Paula Campbell, "Inequality and Consumption." Morgan Stanley US Economics (2014, Registration required).

Thank you to Danny and Adam, John and Sarah, Ellen and Paula.  You have set the stage for our discussion today and framed the debate for serious readers to consider.

There is a debate in the US about the labor force, employment and wages. That debate takes place internally at the central bank, where contrasting views are regularly articulated by members of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) as our Federal Reserve (Fed) policymakers attempt to steer monetary policy with regard to interest rates.

Opinions and assertions about the condition of the US labor force are also offered by financial market participants, advisors, economists, and academics. The three papers cited above are part of that debate. They were written by skilled professionals who have identified, cited, and articulated views succinctly, eloquently, and usefully for anyone who takes the time to read them. I know some of the writers personally and I respect their work. The coincidence of all addressing labor force issues and income led to this weekend's commentary. In our view, the result of reading all three papers and others like them leads to a conclusion: we do not know the answers to the major problems the authors raise.  We do not have certainty.  We do have skilled opinions and assertions.

Those of us in the financial market advising business are trying to grasp how labor force income will rise, at what rate, and in what cohorts, segments or components. We focus on different measures. The data are dependable. It is extensively assembled by means of systems that have been tested over many years. There is reliability in labor force data series.  We are counting things well when we consider the margins for error.

But interpretation and, hence, conclusions are difficult to come by. In fact, a large enigma remains unresolved, in that the labor force participation rate has been trending lower for a long time and has returned to levels last seen in the 1970s. At the same time, the unemployment rate may be inching upward.  Were it to do so, it would signal that growing numbers of Americans seek a return to the labor force by declaring they have the confidence to find employment. If this phenomenon continued for several months – say, six data points – it would surely warrant a re-examination of many premises. We have yet to see that happen.

Maybe an additional positive sign will appear with next Friday's monthly employment report. A positive report would read something like 250,000 new non-farm jobs, a slight tick up in the unemployment rate that is the result of a rising participation rate.  That is a guess, not a forecast.  We will look at the details carefully and the revisions.  That is where we may be able to discern some trends.

It would be good to observe sequentially rising income in the monthly employment reports. Higher pay levels broadly distributed among various categories of workers would indicate that income from labor is rising. It would mean that those who have to pay for labor are willing to pay more and those who provide labor (workers) are able to demand and obtain more. We have not seen that happen in a robust way. Where we do see it occur, it is isolated as opposed to broadly indicative.

It would also be helpful if we saw the income inequality divide narrowing. That would say to us that the distribution of income (assumed also to be wealth, although that is not a perfect identity) is broadening. But as Ellen Zentner notes, income inequality in the US has been widening for decades.

If the wealthy become wealthier, do they spend more on consumption? Are there levels at which "trickle down" ends in a drought? The answer is apparently a mixed but qualified yes. On the other hand, can we see some characteristics of the labor force that suggest that it is normalizing? The answer again is a qualified yes.

One of my favorite statistics is pointed out by Jason Benderly, who suggests that households headed by a male adult with spouse present is a sector whose unemployment rate can be most consistently used to determine when wage pressure is beginning to rise. His reasoning is simple. If the head of household is a man, and it is an intact household in the traditional sense, that man is usually motivated to obtain income to support his family. Highly motivated workers are those who will find work and tighten the labor force more quickly. At some point that trend will be reflected in higher labor incomes.

I also like to look at the single mom statistics, since single women who heads a household is part of a growing component of our society. Women who head households are a highly motivated cohort. In our labor force analytics, we observe both series. We see them improving. That says highly motivated heads of households, be they women or men, are seeking and obtaining jobs and gradually raising their incomes albeit at a slow pace.

Will that trend lead to tightening conditions and then inflation pressure? We do not know. We have presented three papers that readers can view at their leisure in order to draw their own conclusions. The policymakers of the US central bank do not have the answers either. They have divided views, opinions, and assertions. Their current data is the same that we have. It goes without saying that the central bank is looking at history and attempting to drive policy forward. All of us know the peril of driving the car by looking in the rearview mirror. But in the present and confusing environment, history is all we have to help us.

So what do we do with markets?

Cumberland Advisors continues to modify duration in its managed bond accounts, either through hedging tactics or through shortening policies. We believe the short-term US interest rate will remain near zero for the rest of this year and well into 2015. Current market expectations suggest that the first Fed hike might occur in the summer of 2015. We are not sure. There may not be a hike for the entire year. Or the first tap on the interest-rate pedal may come earlier. As of this moment, there is no way to know.  The result is schizophrenia in the discounting mechanism applied to short term interest rates.

The bond market is schizophrenic, too. One day it forecasts higher interest rates, and bond investors panic. The next day, data suggest the opposite.  Resulting bond market disarray ensues and rising bond interest rates seem way out in the future. The market rallies. Schizophrenia prevails in the bond market.

The US stock market struggles with persistently very low interest rates and high liquidity. All of that is due to central bank policy. Meanwhile geopolitical risk rises; headline risk rises; and the new phenomenon of a structurally strengthening US dollar develops. Volatility in stock markets (VIX, SKEW) is reactive.  Valuation metrics suggest the market is priced at a high level yet liquidity abounds and its influence is intense.  Stocks, too, have schizophrenia.

At Cumberland Advisors, we expect a long stretch of rising US dollar strength compared with most other currencies worldwide. Our portfolio shifts reflect that. We are also aware of the geopolitical risk that is abundant in the world and may precipitate a "black swan" event at any time. That could lead to a correction in stock prices.

Stock, bond and liquidity market agents are evidencing schizophrenia. At Cumberland, we are maintaining some cash reserves in our exchange-traded fund portfolios as this is written. That cash could be redeployed at any time.

~~~

David R. Kotok, Chairman and Chief Investment Officer

Big Banks Manipulated $21 Trillion Dollar Market for Credit Default Swaps

Posted: 28 Sep 2014 10:30 PM PDT

 

Derivatives Are Manipulated

Runaway derivatives – especially credit default swaps (CDS) – were one of the main causes of the 2008 financial crisis. Congress never fixed the problem, and actually made it worse.

The big banks have long manipulated derivatives … a $1,200 Trillion Dollar market.

Indeed, many trillions of dollars of derivatives are being manipulated in the exact same same way that interest rates are fixed (see below) … through gamed self-reporting.

Reuters noted last week:

A Manhattan federal judge said on Thursday that investors may pursue a lawsuit accusing 12 major banks of violating antitrust law by fixing prices and restraining competition in the roughly $21 trillion market for credit default swaps.

***

"The complaint provides a chronology of behavior that would probably not result from chance, coincidence, independent responses to common stimuli, or mere interdependence," [Judge] Cote said.

The defendants include Bank of America Corp, Barclays Plc, BNP Paribas SA, Citigroup Inc , Credit Suisse Group AG, Deutsche Bank AG , Goldman Sachs Group Inc, HSBC Holdings Plc , JPMorgan Chase & Co, Morgan Stanley, Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc and UBS AG.

Other defendants are the International Swaps and Derivatives Association and Markit Ltd, which provides credit derivative pricing services.

***

U.S. and European regulators have probed potential anticompetitive activity in CDS. In July 2013, the European Commission accused many of the defendants of colluding to block new CDS exchanges from entering the market.

***

"The financial crisis hardly explains the alleged secret meetings and coordinated actions," the judge wrote. "Nor does it explain why ISDA and Markit simultaneously reversed course."

In other words, the big banks are continuing to fix prices for CDS in secret meetings … and have torpedoed the more open and transparent CDS exchanges that Congress mandated.

As shown below, Wall Street has manipulated virtually every other market as well – both in the financial sector and the real economy – and broken virtually every law on the books.

Interest Rates Are Manipulated

Bloomberg reported in January:

Royal Bank of Scotland Group Plc was ordered to pay $50 million by a federal judge in Connecticut over claims that it rigged the London interbank offered rate.

RBS Securities Japan Ltd. in April pleaded guilty to wire frauda s part of a settlement of more than $600 million with U.S and U.K. regulators over Libor manipulation, according to court filings. U.S. District Judge Michael P. Shea in New Haventoday sentenced the Tokyo-based unit of RBS, Britain's biggest publicly owned lender, to pay the agreed-upon fine, according to a Justice Department Justice Department.

Global investigations into banks' attempts to manipulate the benchmarks for profit have led to fines and settlements for lenders including RBS, Barclays Plc, UBS AG and Rabobank Groep.

RBS was among six companies fined a record 1.7 billion euros ($2.3 billion) by the European Union last month for rigging interest rates linked to Libor. The combined fines for manipulating yen Libor and Euribor, the benchmark money-market rate for the euro, are the largest-ever EU cartel penalties.

Global fines for rate-rigging have reached $6 billion since June 2012 as authorities around the world probe whether traders worked together to fix Libor, meant to reflect the interest rate at which banks lend to each other, to benefit their own trading positions.

To put the Libor interest rate scandal in perspective:

  • Even though RBS and a handful of other banks have been fined for interest rate manipulation, Libor is still being manipulated. No wonder … the fines are pocket change – the cost of doing business – for the big banks

Currency Markets Are Rigged

Currency markets are massively rigged. And see this and this.

Energy Prices Manipulated

The U.S. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission says that JP Morgan has massively manipulated energy markets in California and the Midwest, obtaining tens of millions of dollars in overpayments from grid operators between September 2010 and June 2011.

Pulitzer prize-winning reporter David Cay Johnston noted in May that Wall Street is trying to launch Enron 2.0.

Oil Prices Are Manipulated

Oil prices are manipulated as well.

Gold and Silver Are Manipulated

Gold and silver prices are "fixed" in the same way as interest rates and derivatives – in daily conference calls by the powers-that-be.

Bloomberg reports:

It is the participating banks themselves that administer the gold and silver benchmarks.

So are prices being manipulated? Let's take a look at the evidence. In his book "The Gold Cartel," commodity analyst Dimitri Speck combines minute-by-minute data from most of 1993 through 2012 to show how gold prices move on an average day (see attached charts). He finds that the spot price of gold tends to drop sharply around the London evening fixing (10 a.m. New York time). A similar, if less pronounced, drop in price occurs around the London morning fixing. The same daily declines can be seen in silver prices from 1998 through 2012.

For both commodities there were, on average, no comparable price changes at any other time of the day. These patterns are consistent with manipulation in both markets.

Commodities Are Manipulated

The big banks and government agencies have been conspiring to manipulate commodities prices for decades.

The big banks are taking over important aspects of the physical economy, including uranium mining, petroleum products, aluminum, ownership and operation of airports, toll roads, ports, and electricity.

And they are using these physical assets to massively manipulate commodities prices … scalping consumers of many billions of dollars each year. More from Matt Taibbi, FDL and Elizabeth Warren.

Everything Can Be Manipulated through High-Frequency Trading

Traders with high-tech computers can manipulate stocks, bonds, options, currencies and commodities. And see this.

Manipulating Numerous Markets In Myriad Ways

The big banks and other giants manipulate numerous markets in myriad ways, for example:

  • Engaging in mafia-style big-rigging fraud against local governments. See this, this and this
  • Shaving money off of virtually every pension transaction they handled over the course of decades, stealing collectively billions of dollars from pensions worldwide. Details here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here, here and here
  • Pledging the same mortgage multiple times to different buyers. See this, this, this, this and this. This would be like selling your car, and collecting money from 10 different buyers for the same car
  • Pushing investments which they knew were terrible, and then betting against the same investments to make money for themselves. See this, this, this, this and this
  • Engaging in unlawful "Wash Trades" to manipulate asset prices. See this, this and this
  • Bribing and bullying ratings agencies to inflate ratings on their risky investments

The Big Picture

The experts say that big banks will keep manipulating markets unless and until their executives are thrown in jail for fraud.

Why? Because the system is rigged to allow the big banks to commit continuous and massive fraud, and then to pay small fines as the "cost of doing business". As Nobel prize winning economist Joseph Stiglitz noted years ago:

"The system is set so that even if you're caught, the penalty is just a small number relative to what you walk home with.

The fine is just a cost of doing business. It's like a parking fine. Sometimes you make a decision to park knowing that you might get a fine because going around the corner to the parking lot takes you too much time."

Experts also say that we have to prosecute fraud or else the economy won't ever really stabilize.

But the government is doing the exact opposite. Indeed, the Justice Department has announced it will go easy on big banks, and always settles prosecutions for pennies on the dollar (a form of stealth bailout. It is also arguably one of the main causes of the double dip in housing.)

Indeed, the government doesn't even force the banks to admit any guilt as part of their settlements.

Again Wall Street has manipulated virtually every other market as well – both in the financial sector and the real economy – and broken virtually every law on the books.

And they will keep on doing so until the Department of Justice grows a pair.

The criminality and blatant manipulation will grow and spread and metastasize – taking over and killing off more and more of the economy – until Wall Street executives are finally thrown in jail.

It's that simple …

Asness, Bogle on Investment Strategy, Pension Funds

Posted: 28 Sep 2014 03:00 PM PDT

Clifford Asness, managing and founding principal of AQR Capital Management, and John C. Bogle, founder of Vanguard Group Inc., talk about investment strategy, fund management and the outlook for pension funds. Bloomberg’s Tom Keene moderates the discussion at the Bloomberg Markets Most Influential Summit in New York.


Source: Bloomberg, Sept. 22 2014

10 Sunday AM Reads

Posted: 28 Sep 2014 05:00 AM PDT

Pour yourself a cup of coffee, and sit back for some Sunday morning reads:

• Hedge Funds Lose Calpers, and More (NYT)
• One Of The Biggest Bulls For The Past Few Years Has An Ominous New Tone (Business Insider)
Blood Feud Gundlach and Morningstar:  Dubbed DoubleLine Total Return fund “not ratable” despite its outperformance, amid bad blood with manager Jeffrey Gundlach. (Barron’s)
• Zero Hedge: Wall Street’s daily dose of doom and gloom (Money)
Financial Media Wakeup Call: The Big Disconnect (Reformed Broker) see also Anthony Bourdain has become the future of cable news, and he couldn’t care less. (Fast Company)
• Gross Loses Pimco Power Struggle With 'Stunning' Exit (Bloomberg)
• How lasers revealed a lost city in the jungle (BBC)
• Aggressive policing has led to seizure of hundreds of millions of dollars from people not charged with crimes (Washington Post)
• Record Share of Americans Have Never Married (Pew Research)
• NFL tried too hard to control message (ESPN)

What’s for Brunch?

 

 Inequality Has Increased With Each Expansion in the Postwar Era
inequality
Source: NYT

 

Kiron Sarkar’s Weekly Report 9.27.14

Posted: 28 Sep 2014 03:00 AM PDT

The US, together with 5 Arab nations, launched air strikes against ISIS in Syria. Whilst positive that a number of Arab states are participating, this is going to be a long campaign.

The Chinese finance minister, Mr Lou Jiwei, stated that growth faces downward pressure, though China will not make major policy changes to compensate. However, I suspect that at the end of the day the government will have to increase both monetary and fiscal stimulus, as the slowdown is far more severe than thought initially.

The Wall Street Journal reports that the Chinese leadership is considering replacing Mr Zhou as head of the Central Bank in the next month or so. Mr Zhou has pressed for financial and economic reforms, rather than the interventionist policies pursued by the Chinese leadership. If he is to be replaced, the chances of further monetary and fiscal stimulus increases, which should help the commodities based currencies and equities.

There are increasing signs that the Eurozone (EZ) economy is slowing. This has lead to speculation that the ECB will increase monetary accommodation. However, I suspect that the ECB will wait until its next TLTRO programme, together with its covered bonds/asset backed securities purchase programmes are launched before considering other options, which suggests no further changes this year. Next week’s inflation data will be important. Due to a further decline in energy prices and as a result of base effects, inflation may well fall further.

With the exception of the US and the UK, the other major economies seem to be weakening. Emerging markets are also under pressure. The weaker global economy is reducing inflationary pressures, in particular due to lower commodity prices and a stronger US$. Lower inflation reduces the pressure on the FED to increase interest rates, though, for the present, I continue to believe that the FED will raise rates in H1 next year.

The US 10 year bond yield declined to 2.50%, though the departure of Mr Bill Gross from Pimco, which bond investors believe will result in sales of US bonds by the firm as investor money follows Mr Gross to his new firm, resulted in yields closing at 2.53%. Global bond yields also declined.

President Obama has suggested that he may reduce sanctions on Russia if it cooperates in enforcing the recent ceasefire in the Ukraine. There is speculation that Russia may introduce legislation to nationalise assets owned by foreigners. The situation remains uneasy to say the least.

The US$ strength looks set to continue, whilst the Euro has weakened, a trend which I expect will continue.

US
US existing home sales came in at an annualised rate of 5.05mn in August, below the rate of 5.20mn expected and July's 5.14mn. Purchases by investors declined to the lowest in almost 5 years. Furthermore, sales of lower priced homes are failing to gain traction. However, new home sales soared by 18% M/M to an annualised rate of 504k in August and well above expectations of an annualised rate of 430k and August's 427k. It was the highest rate since May 2008.

The FED has warned banks that increasing the amount of high-risk assets on their balance sheets may well require them to hold additional capital. There have been a spate of "covenant-lite" high yield bonds issued this year, which Barclay's estimates will amount to over 70% of total issuances. In addition, total leverage on new deals has reached 4.95 times Ebitda, exceeding the highs reached in 2007. (Source Bloomberg).

Capital goods orders (ex aircraft and defense) rose by +0.6% M/M in August, better than the increase of +0.2% in July and above the forecast for an increase of +0.4%.

US weekly unemployment claims came in at 293k, better than the 296k expected, though above the previous weeks 281k.

US Q2 GDP was revised higher to +4.6% on an annualised basis (the most since Q4 2011), in line with expectations and up from the previous estimate of +4.2%.

Europe
In testimony to the EU Parliament, Mr Draghi stated that the recovery in the EZ was losing momentum, with the risks clearly to the downside. The ECB was ready to use additional unconventional measures and may alter the size and/or composition of its present measures, if inflation remained too low for too long. Unemployment was unacceptably high. He added, the 1st trance of the TLTRO was within the ECB's expected range, a bit of a fib, as most analysts expected a much higher amount. Furthermore, he added that the ECB had reached the lower bound on interest rates. Nothing really new other than confirmation that the EZ economy was stalling.

EZ September consumer confidence slipped to -11.4, from -10.0 in August and below the reading of -10.5 expected.

The German IFO business climate index declined to 104.7 in September (the lowest since April 2013), down from 106.3 in August and below the forecast of 105.8. The current conditions component came in at 110.5, slightly better than the 110.2 expected, though below 111.1 in August, whilst the expectations component declined to 99.3, down from 101.2 expected and 101.7 in August.

German flash manufacturing PMI declined to 50.3 in September, down from 51.4 in August and the forecast of 51.2. It was the weakest reading since June 2013. The new orders component declined to 48.8, from 51.1 previously, the 1st reading below the 50.0 neutral level since June 2013. However services PMI rose to 55.4, up from 54.9 in August. The composite PMI rose to 54.0, up from 53.7 in August.

French flash September manufacturing PMI came in at 48.8, better than the 47.0 expected and above August's reading of 46.9. September flash services PMI came in at 49.4, lower than August's 50.3 and below the forecast of 50.1.

EZ flash September manufacturing PMI came in at 50.5, slightly lower than 50.6 expected and August's 50.7. It was a 14 month low. EZ flash September services PMI declined to 52.8, slightly lower than the reading of 53.0 expected and down from 53.1 in August. The EZ flash September composite PMI declined to a 9 month low of 52.3, down slightly from 52.5 in August and below the forecast of 52.5. The decline suggests that the EZ economy slowed in Q3.

The Spanish economy has improved materially over the last year. However, the Bank of Spain warns that private consumption and new job creation are weakening, which will result in Q3 growth slowing. However, the government has raised its 2015 GDP forecasts to +2.0% (+1.3% for 2014), from +1.8% previously.

Japan
Japanese September PMI declined to 51.7, down from 52.2 in August. Both the new orders and exports components declined. Yet more data which suggests that the Japanese economy is weakening.

CPI, excluding fresh food, rose by +3.1% Y/Y in August (+3.3% in July), below the rise of +3.2% expected. However, excluding the impact of the sales tax rise, CPI came in at just +1.1%, as opposed to +1.3% in July. Unless the Yen weakens materially, the BoJ is unlikely to meet its target of 2.0% target in the fiscal year beginning next April, which suggests that the BoJ will have to increase its monetary stimulus programme. Indeed, there is a risk that inflation will decline even further.

China
The HSBC September flash manufacturing PMI came in at 50.5, up from 50.2 in August and above the forecast for a decline to 50.0. The new orders and export components rose to the highest since March 2010, though the employment component declined to 46.9, the lowest since February 2009.

Chinese banks are likely to ease mortgage restrictions for 2nd home buyers, who will be eligible for a 30% reduction in mortgage rates. Yet another sign that the government is highly concerned about the property sector.

Other
The Australian Bureau of Resource and Energy Economics (ABREE) reduced its 2014 forecast for iron ore prices down to US$94 a metric ton, lower than the US$105 which it forecast in June. The ABREE 2015 forecast was reduced to US$94, from US$97 previously. Private sector forecasts are even lower than the ABREE forecasts at around US$85 for 2015/16. Excess supplies will keep prices under pressure for many years, with a number of high cost mines closing, though supplies are still expected to exceed demand. Chinese demand is key. One bad sign was that Chinese steel consumption declined by -0.3% Y/Y in the 8 months to August, with the decline accelerating to -1.9% in August M/M. Weaker commodity prices has resulted in the A$ declining further, in particular against the US$.

A further sign of the weaker global economy is the decline in copper prices, which are at their lowest in more than 3 months. Clearly reduced demand from China is impacting.

Crop prices have also declined and are near their lowest since 2010.

The World bank reports that consumption in Russia, which is roughly 50% of the US$2 tr economy, will slow to +0.5% next year and +0.6% in 2016, down from +2.0% this year. They forecast that GDP will come in at +0.5% this year, lower than the +1.3% in 2013. GDP is forecast to reduce further to +0.3% in 2015 and +0.4% in 2016. Lower oil prices are also hurting the economy.

The IMF warns that Saudi Arabia could face a budget deficit of -1.4% of GDP next year, significantly below its previous forecast for a surplus of +4.0%. Domestic expenditures have rocketed and the country has provided material aid to a number of other countries, a trend which is set to continue. Furthermore, the country is to increase infrastructure spending and welfare payments.

S&P raised India's credit rating outlook to stable from negative, whilst maintaining its BBB- rating. The government has promised to reduce the budget deficit to 4.1% of GDP for the year ending 31st March 2015, down from 4.5% the previous fiscal year. That, I suspect, seems highly unlikely.

Kiron Sarkar
27th September 2014

.

0 comments:

Post a Comment

previous home Next

{8} chatroll


{9} AdBrite FOOTER

{8} Nice Blogs (Adgetize)